Your friend has been really excited about their new shoes from the brand Allbirds, which they bought online. Since they told you about them, you’ve been curious about the brand. You decided to check out the Allbirds website to see their shoe options, and consider maybe getting a pair for yourself.
The worst thing about my experience is that the main page said one thing about having a limited edition color for sneakers (would’nt let me navigate and interact with it) so I had to go the long way in trying to find the same pair I liked. However in finding it, it wasn’t consistent since the color was not shown as a choice for the same sneakers it showed on the main page.
Adding a lot more sustainability and explanations and comparisons of how these sneakers and apparel are more sustainable than other retailers and explain that data and how it came about. Also, make tab menu navigation on the site so its easier to know the different sections on the site and be able to navigate and find all the sections without missing out on information. Make sustainability a priority and advertise as such on the main page at the top and throughout.
I liked how modern it looked and the sustainability the company offers with their shoes.
No other comments other than my improvement suggestions. I hope all of this is helpful! I do really value sustainability, biodegradability, recycling, etc. I would love to see more on the site about the materials (how they are sustainable) and what that means for how long the shoe will last and what to do when the shoe is worn out. i.e. can it be recycled? does the company take it back? I would also love to see as part of the sustainability initiation program that there are ways people can buy "not perfect" or "defected products" for a whole lot less so these potential mess ups in products don’t go to waste and this also helps sustainability, along with partnering with conservation organizations like WWF or 4Ocean.
You have been eyeing some new supplies for your dog and decide to do some online browsing.
3
As I mentioned, the text on the homepage seemed cramped and the overall design of the homepage seemed a little throw together. None of the products really excited me as a user.
I like how easy it was to search for things. It was easy to customize my search, so even if they didn’t carry the right brand I could find a replacement.
All accounts, tests, and data have been migrated to our new & improved system!
Use the same email and password to log in:
Legacy login: Our legacy system is still available in view-only mode, login here >
Which one should you choose?
Easily compare two of the top usability testing platforms and find out which one is the perfect fit for your next project.
Starting a new project often comes with uncertainty—especially when it comes to choosing the right tool to deliver the insights you need. That’s why we’ve created this UserZoom vs Trymata comparison, giving you a clear look at how each platform stacks up so you can find the best fit for your goals and work flow.
Our mission is to help you choose the usability testing solution that works best for your projects. Whether you decide on UserZoom or Trymata, we want you to have the clarity, confidence, and insights to make the right decision—so you can start gathering meaningful feedback and moving your projects forward with success.
| Features | UserZoom | Trymata |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Transparency | Pricing is not publicly disclosed; it is generally high and geared toward enterprise contracts. | Transparent plans; paid plans start around US$399/month. |
| Cost Efficiency | Less cost-efficient for smaller teams/projects; high baseline costs because of enterprise features and scale. | More efficient per test for small to mid-sized teams with fewer resources; lower entry cost. |
| Testing Types & Features | Broad capabilities: moderated + unmoderated testing, detailed surveys, card sorting, prototype & tree testing, large-scale UX research. | Strong focus on unmoderated usability testing, video feedback, and task success metrics; supports prototypes, live site tests, and BYOP (bring your own participants) in most plans. |
| Panel & Participant Options | Large participant pools, recruitment support, and strong demographic filters are designed to handle large-scale participant recruitment. | Also offers its own vetted panel and supports BYOP; flexibility to use your testers plus theirs. |
| Ideal Use Case | Best for enterprises or large UX teams doing complex research, high volumes, needing broad methods and deep analytics. | Best for small-to-mid-sized teams, or projects where budget and speed matter more than having all advanced/enterprise-scale features. |
| Speed & Setup | Setup tends to involve more customization, onboarding, and longer contracts; ideal when you need robust, large-scale UX infrastructure. | Faster to start: lower barriers, more straightforward test creation; good for quicker turnaround on usability tests. |
*Based on reviews and info from G2, trymata.com, capterra.
Strong usability testing toolkit with video feedback, task success metrics, and unmoderated testing designed for quick, actionable insights.
Comprehensive UX scoring suite and a distinctive UX Crowd tool that fosters collaborative insight prioritization.
Flexible participant options, including a vetted panel plus free BYOP (Bring Your Own Participants), offering more control over recruiting.
Best fit for small to mid-sized teams that need reliable usability insights on tighter budgets or shorter timelines.
